Showing posts with label Wollongong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wollongong. Show all posts

Friday, 6 July 2012

Silence, discretion or straight-out lies? Sexual abuse and the Catholic Church

This Blog post is about the Catholic Church and its apparent cover-up of sexual abuse incidents. A sub-theme of this article is the call by some people for a Royal Commission into sexual abuse in Australia.
Wilcox's brilliant cartoon
from today's Sydney Morning Herald

Firstly some disclaimers:
  1. I was raised as a Catholic. I no longer practice that religion, but it is something which is part of my culture, training and family background. It is not something which I can ignore, nor deny.
  2. I was never subject to sexual abuse at school - unless you widen the definition slightly, to include Bullying and aggressive and painful Nipple Tweaking by a sadistic Christian Brother. At the time I only thought of this as sadistic behaviour - in retrospect I am no longer sure it was as innocent as that.
  3. I went through a few years in a NSW Catholic seminary (St Columba's at Springwood, NSW), between March 1966 and June 1968, and then went to Rome for a further 18 months. One of my seminary colleagues is mentioned in the Sydney Morning Herald article. John Usher (now Monsignor John Usher), was a "senior student" at the time, not a close colleague. He is now a highly trusted colleague of Cardinal Pell, and is now Chancellor of the Archdiocese of Sydney (one of many other functions he fulfills).
  4. One of my classmates in Springwood subsequently (years later) came to public attention: "John Sidney Denham pleaded guilty to 29 child sex charges involving 27 boys under his care while a Roman Catholic priest in Newcastle in the 1970s." At the time I knew him, I saw no signs of his propensity for abusing children. But isn't that usually the case?
Yesterday's Sydney Morning Herald Editorial is worth reading in full.
it states, in part:
  •  "When Patrick Parkinson calls for a royal commission into sexual abuse and its cover-up in the Catholic Church, he deserves a good hearing. As a Sydney University law professor, he knows a thing or two about the machinery of inquiry and the suitability of extreme powers possessed by royal commissions. As an adviser to the Catholic Church on sexual abuse cases, he is well acquainted with the church's obstructionist culture of concealment. ''We need a royal commission with subpoena powers,'' Parkinson said this week. ''The files of the Catholic Church must be opened up.''
    "This is the running sore that won't leave the church alone."

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/editorial/shedding-light-on-church-concealment-20120704-21hih.html#ixzz1zil8M4Td
"Broken Rites" story (updated on 9 June 2012) says:
  • On 3 September 1991 (according to an official document in the possession of Broken Rites) Father XYZ was called to a meeting at the Sydney Cathedral presbytery, attended by three church officials:

    • Reverend Brian Lucas (then based at the Sydney Cathedral), who was involved in the administration of the Sydney archdiocese.
    • Reverend John Usher, of the Sydney archdiocese, chairperson of the Australian Catholic Welfare Commission.
    • Reverend Wayne Peters, a senior priest of the Armidale diocese, whose responsibilities then included the Armidale diocese Tribunal (Peters later became Armidale's vicar-general).
    Interviewed by the three officials, Father XYZ admitted that he had been committing sexual acts on young boys in his parishes. [According to the New South Wales criminal laws, these offences would constitute the crime of indecent assault of a child.]
    Source:


      That story has been followed-up by the Four Corners program on Monday Night - which I could not bring myself to watch in full, as I find the subject too stressful. But I did follow their main points.

      As I indicated in line 2 of my Disclaimer, above, I was never subjected to sexual abuse, but a number of my friends and colleagues were (but I only learned that much later in life). It is a painful issue, for sexual abuse is one of those things, where the pain continues for years after the incident. Psychologically, it resurfaces when one's vulnerability is greatest, and when one least expects it. A casual comment, a headline in a paper, or a familiar face on the street, can bring issues flooding back into one's head.

      I have followed at a distance, reports from the USA of the corruption in the Boston Diocese, and more recently I saw much of a very stressful BBC program about an Irish-American priest who had retired to Ireland after years of sexual abuse of children. To say he lacked empathy and understanding of his offences is an understatement. It was shown on the ABC in May. The powerful and painful program, called "Deliver us from Evil", documented the long-term and systematic abusive behaviour and yet the apparent lack of empathy, or remorse, of the main offender, Fr. Oliver O'Grady.
      There have been some rare, but famous cases in the USA where convictions have been recorded, not for perpetrators, but for other Priests who failed to act to disbar offending Priests, or who failed to report them to civil Authorities - which would parallel the suggested legal action against the three NSW priests, mentioned in the Four Corners program.

      To read the open letters on the ABC comments page is an eye-opener.
      And it goes without saying it is not just the Catholics, though as Wikipedia records, they are extremely frequent offenders. That is an appalling litany of offences - and they are only the proven cases.

      We all know that it is not just the Catholics, but lets state that "for the record".
      Anglicans, Salvation Army, Jehovah's Witnesses (whose victims are still so scared, they talk on Facebook and the Internet in coded terms, for fear of retribution), and there is a big question mark over the Boy Scout movement in Australia, or specifically the history of sexual offences by Scout leaders. And State-run orphanages have been involved as well. And locally, we cannot forget the highly placed persons who were involved as collaborators in the Frank Arkell and Tony Bevan circle of child abusers in Wollongong. 
      •  "... long running campaign to expose paedophilia in the Wollongong community and in the local Catholic Church. In 1993 the Mercury first revealed the problem of widespread sexual abuse of young boys by exposing two paedophiles, Father Peter Comensoli and Brother Michael Evans. The Page 1 exposé was preceded by four months of investigation during which Mercury staff obtained statutory declarations from seven young men. 
      • Involved in the paedophile network, as revealed by the Wood Royal Commission into the NSW police, was a former Wollongong Lord Mayor and Independent NSW MP, Frank Arkell.
        When Arkell was the victim of a gruesome murder on June 27, 1998, about 10 weeks before he was to have appeared in court on sex charges involving young males, the Mercury published with its next issue an eight-page wrap-around, labelled “Arkell Murder Edition”. The
        Page 1 story, written by Cullen, described the appearance of Arkell's body in detail: “His skull had been caved in, and a
        Rotary Club pin driven into one of his eyes. Tie pins were jammed into his cheeks.”
      In many of these cases, there are highly placed members of the legal profession who act as cross-examiners, ridiculers and intimidators of inexperienced children trying to give evidence. They act to "run interference" on behalf of their powerful, deviant and abusive friends, and in all likelihood, some have been participants in the abuse themselves.

      Educational Institutions, especially Boarding Schools, seem to be the greatest "targets" for paedophiles. 
      Christian Brothers schools, Marist Colleges, and in particular St Stanislaus College at Bathurst all seem to be magnets for these people. 

      Leading clerics, even the present Cardinal Pell, (then Bishop of Ballarat) supported known sex offenders such as Fr Gerald Ridsdale.

      Why did Bishop George Pell
      accompany Fr
      Gerald Francis Ridsdale
      to court on 27 May 1993
      when Ridsdale was jailed for child-sex crimes?
       And now a Victorian report states:
      • CONFIDENTIAL police reports have detailed the suicides of at least 40 people sexually abused by Catholic clergy in Victoria, and have urged a new inquiry into these and many other deaths suspected to be linked to abuse in the church.
        In a damning assessment of the church’s handling of abuse issues, the reports say it appears the church has known about a shockingly high rate of suicides and premature deaths but has "chosen to remain silent." 

      It seems to me that wherever adults are involved in "caring for children" there is a great likelihood of abuse, unfortunately. It seems to me, that the first thing society ought change is that we ought to stop pretending that sexual abuse does not happen. 

      IT DOES. AND THE PEOPLE WHO DO THESE THINGS LIVE AMONG US. 
      Let us all open our eyes and ears.

      After writing this I feel obliged to issue a general warning:

      please be careful with your children.


      ****************

      What are the chances that a Royal Commission will be called and given wide terms of reference?

      With regard to the possibility of a Royal Commission, one has to ask which level of Government ought conduct such an Inquiry?

      The Federal Government is currently not over-run with Catholics, indeed many profess to be atheists. But, certainly there are enough "cultural Catholics" amongst the Federal Government - for many of them might well have been educated in Church schools. Anthony Albanese, Tony Burke, Stephen Conroy, Craig Emerson, Laurie and Martin Ferguson, John Murphy,  But if this call for a Royal Commission carries on until the next Government is sworn in, if it is led by Tony Abbott and his ilk, look out. There are many, many Catholic-trained politicians on that side of Politics. Tony Abbott himself, Joe Hockey, Christopher Pine and there are many more.

      In NSW, where the Liberal-National Coalition is in office:
      • Barry O'Farrell is Catholic educated, with an Irish family background, but I see little evidence of his religious views. But it is one thing to not be an active supporter of the Church, and a totally different thing to preside over a Royal Commission into the Church. That's unlikely to happen. 
      • Chris Hartcher is a Riverview boy, educated by the Jesuits, and I would describe him as aggressively Catholic in his attitudes.
      • Andrew Stoner, while seemingly not a Catholic, describes himself as a "committed Christian"
      • the "back-room boy" who controls the hard right grouping is David Clarke, a member of the Opus Dei, a right-wing religious organisation which has managed to infiltrate itself deeply within the power-structure of the Catholic Church. 
      • Greg Smith is the NSW Attorney General, and another active Catholic.
      • And there are many more.
      There is no way the O'Farrell Government will call a Royal Commission into sexual abuse by the Catholic Church, in my opinion.


      Any Royal Commission on this subject would have to be called by the Federal Labor Party and quickly. Otherwise this idea is simply not going to get the necessary political support. Tony Abbott, who styles himself as a confidante of Cardinal Pell certainly would not call such a Royal Commission.

      The Catholics have achieved a strangle-hold on politics in Australia.


      You might assume that many of the Catholic politicians are decent people: 
      • unless you are a woman, who wishes to control her fertility
      • or unless you are gay or lesbian.
      but those are matters for another day.

      But after writing this
      I feel I need a good shower.
      But more importantly I feel
      obliged to issue a general warning:

      please be careful with your children.


      *********************
       

      If you can stand it, there is a vast amount of references available about sexual abuse in Australia. Here are just a few of the readily available sources:

      • http://www.deception.com.au/images/hypocrites.pdf
      • http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/bccrime.html
      • http://www.clergyabuseaustralia.org/
      • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sexual_abuse_scandal_in_Australia
      • http://www.snapaustralia.org/
      • http://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=31038






      Thursday, 24 February 2011

      Coal and Gas forum in Wollongong - breaches of Caretaker Conventions

      Today there was a Department of Planning Coal and Gas forum in Wollongong. The event was billed as a "consultative meeting" by the NSW Dept of Planning.
       
      They didn't want to hear what we said (despite statements to the contrary). They simply wanted us to hear what their message was (of course).
      What a farce!

      Public Servants were put through their paces, to make the Minister (or the Government generally) look good. 

       
      Their answers were a mixture of bluster and sycophancy. Long on rhetoric, but short on detail. They certainly gave wrong answers about the draining of the Woronora Reservoir, and failed to understand carefully worded questions about removal of radio-nucleotides from contaminated groundwater, as a result of drilling.

       
      They certainly did not satisfy that half of the audience who were clearly "environmentally conscious". Nikki Williams and her supporters from the NSW Minerals Council, and the guys from the CFMEU might have been pleased, though.

      • To start with, the largest landholder in the region, the Sydney Catchment Authority, was not invited to attend, either as a participant (it is a Government agency after all, and it is meant to be a "whole of Government process" as the Minister, Tony Kelly, told us), or as "victim" of the Dept of Planning's appalling Mining Approvals procedures.
      It is a nonsense for the Labor Government to pretend that they are calling for detailed Submissions, (due in mid April, after the election), when the Government is 5 weeks out from a State election. 

      Worse, today they put themselves in breach of the long-established Caretaker Conventions The opinions expressed on Caretaker Conventions in the linked article are from the ALP's own favourite policy advisers - Hawker Britton. I haven't made that advice up - but it accords entirely with my own personal understanding.
       
      And anyway, what's the point of the Government going through this elaborate charade? If the current opposition gets in, they will drop the whole idea, as "tainted" by having Labor's fingerprints all over it. And rightly so, too.

      As a former Federal Public Servant, one from the days when Public Servants were trained to give "free and frank advice" *** I was both fascinated and appalled to watch the reality of the political process in action in NSW today. 


      How can senior DoP officials possibly be expected to give straight answers to honest questions from the public when the Minister, and the local Member are sitting in the room watching them "perform"? That is a clear abuse of the neutrality of the Public Service.

      Democracy? I don't think the NSW Government understands the meaning of the word.


      *****

      After several hours of "stewing" over what we were put through, today, I have come to the following conclusion:- What we witnessed today was clearly a joint job application for positions in the Mining Industry, in anticipation of the defeat of their current employer, the NSW ALP Government.

      Today's meeting was held in the "Diggers Club" in Wollongong, the centre of BHP's empire, in Australia. I thought (in advance) that the choice of venue was simply a large RSL meeting room. But to watch the performance of the Dept of Planning "boys", the penny has now dropped. It was a collective Job Application. They were so totally "pro-mining", the choice of venue was appropriate.
      The name "Diggers Club" takes on a whole new meaning.



      Denis Wilson
      Robertson NSW 2577
      Chairman, Australian Water Campaigners
      (The foregoing is my personal opinion.)


      *** Caretaker Conventions.
      http://www.hawkerbritton.com/hawker-britton-media/public-affairs/nsw-government-caretaker-conventions.htm

      The Caretaker Period
      The formal period during which the caretaker conventions operate dates from the dissolution of the Legislative Assembly until the election result is clear, or, in the event of a change of Government, until the new Government is appointed.
      The NSW Government assumes a ‘caretaker’ role during the period immediately before an election to ensure:
      • decisions are not taken which would bind an incoming Government and limit its freedom of action;
      • important decisions are not made by Ministers who cannot be held accountable once the Legislative Assembly has been dissolved;
      • the neutrality of the public service is protected; and
      • state resources are not being used in election campaigns, or to advance the aims of a particular party.

      *** Free and frank advice

      It is the responsibility of public servants to provide honest, impartial and comprehensive advice to ministers and to alert ministers to the possible consequences of following particular policies, whether or not such advice accords with Ministers’ views.

      Saturday, 13 September 2008

      NSW Council Elections

      NSW Council Elections are being held in most New South Wales (State) Local Government areas today. However, if you live in Wollongong, (and I believe Shellharbour, and Coffs Harbour - don't take my word for these latter ones, but in Wollongong it is certainly the case) then you cannot vote today. That is because your previous Council was sacked by the NSW Government for corrupt behaviour and/or incompetence.

      Why should that decision (to sack a Council) disenfranchise the community - for another 4 years?

      Anyway, in happy little Wingecarribee Shire, our Council escaped the verdict of incompetence or corruption (because Sydney had bigger fish to fry), and our Council survived to the bitter end of its life. So today we got to vote for a new Council.

      At least the weather was nice, this morning in Robertson, when I lined up to take the "How to Vote" cards from the hander-outerers at the front gate of the Robertson School of Arts.

      And who did I vote for?
      We have secret ballots, fortunately. But I will tell you who I did NOT vote for.
      • Malcolm Murray and his team.
      • Duncan Gair and his team.
      • May King and her team, and the
      • Liberal Party team.

      And I voted No and No on the so-called Poll regarding the Leisure Centre.

      Geraldine Turner (of the Save the Highlands team), Larry Whipper, Jim Clark and the Greens team, Graham McLaughlin and the Labor Team, Jim Mauger and his team, and Ken Halstead can all take some comfort from that information. As an individual voter I can only choose my preferences, but if there are not enough voters of like minds to get a particular candidate over the "Quota" line, then sorry, but I have done my best.

      I only have a single vote, after all.

      If you do not like that situation, then perhaps you ought talk to a local political wheeler and dealer (a particularly lucky boy). He might possibly have some ideas as how to overcome that hurdle. Personally, I am content to stick with the old "One Vote, One Value" concept.

      We shall see over the ensuing days who has been elected, and whether the Leisure Centre has been rejected in the Poll.

      The Southern Highlands News has done an excellent job of covering the Election Candidates opinions on a range of subjects. However, they have let themselves down with this last minute word of advice: "Dismiss the theatrics of the past few weeks, disregard your loyalties, and vote with your head!" That is a cop out, in my opinion. We have many candidates who were Councillors last time who frankly do not deserve to be re-elected.

      Wednesday, 2 April 2008

      Life in Wollongong is going down the mine.

      Just south from Yallah (a southern suburb of Greater Wollongong), is a new sub-division on reclaimed land. In other words, it is a once-good swamp now being turned into a housing estate.
      The thing about this place is, it is being built entirely on fill which is "coal wash". The "coal wash" comes from the mines, of course, and then, before the coal is used, or exported, it is sieved, washed and the usable coal goes to the mills, and the "coal wash" gets dumped. Then developers come along, and propose to use it for land fill, and build houses there, and people are so keen to get their own houses that they will buy anything.
      This is the view along the street at the edge of Haywards Bay (a brand new housing estate).
      This practice has been subject to Question in Parliament, but are the questions asked, the really important questions? For example, they ask about petro-chemical residues in coal wash. That was denied. But I would have asked about sulphur levels, and heavy metal contaminants?
      • 0307: Mr Jones to the Minister for Natural Resources:
      • (24) Throughout the Wollongong regions there are a number of instances where residential development has occurred on filled lands. In all instances the Local Government Authorities have provided stringent guidelines on the nature of the fill to be used and how it should be emplaced. Geotechnical surveys in accordance with engineering requirement are usually a necessary component before such developments are approved.
      • (25) Any proposal to fill and develop residential buildings will require approval from Local Government Authorities based upon detailed geotechnical and engineering studies. All water which flows onto and away from the filled lands would require special consideration, incorporating detailed hydrologic and hydraulic assessment.
      • Question asked on 26 March 92 (session 50-2) and printed in Questions & Answers Paper No. 13. Answer to be printed in Questions & Answers Paper No. 20.
      • Source: Hansard and Papers, Legislative Council, Questions: 0307, Parliament of New South Wales.
      Is this the view you would expect from Shoreline Avenue, Hayward's Bay?
      I was shocked by what I saw, but clearly other people do not see things the way that I do. On Sunday morning, there were many people looking at the display houses in this area. Clearly the developers level the coal wash out, and top-fill it (with soil). But when excavations were being done for footings, the builders went down to the black coal wash, just about 300 mm down (approx. 18 inches). What happens if you plant a tree? Will it be able to grow in this stuff? And what about the long-term health effects for people living on this land fill?

      Saturday, 23 February 2008

      It is by being quiet and polite we allow ourselves to be ignored

      Dear oh dear.
      Gone is the famous: "Love to Grow: Grow to Love" motto I used have as my signature block.
      It might return one day.
      However, we face Council selling off bits of Public Parks all around the Wingecarribee Shire. The NSW Government is destroying our Rivers and Aquifers either through their own work (SCA) or by allowing the Coal Miners to do it, while accepting huge Part 3A payments. Wollongong Council is revealed to be as corrupt as we always felt it was. Shellharbour Council is even less amenable to environmental concerns than Wollongong (and that is saying something). NSW Labor Party politicians in the Illawarra region are said to have accepted "campaign donations" from developers (Can that be true, Matt?, David?, Noreen?)


      So I have changed my signature block.

      THE NSW GOVERNMENT AND THE WINGECARRIBEE SHIRE COUNCIL
      ARE SCREWING US OVER..........REMEMBER THIS:
      "BY BEING QUIET AND POLITE WE ALLOW OURSELVES TO BE IGNORED"
      REMEMBER: "IT IS BY BEING QUIET AND POLITE CITIZENS WE ALLOW OURSELVES TO BE IGNORED"