Tuesday, 23 June 2009

Beware the Media in a "Feeding Frenzy".

How quickly they forget - the Media, I mean.

I am sure that you will recall, that Dr David Kelly, a British Weapons Expert, got caught up in a Media interview about the so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction which were supposed to be in Iraq. He subsequently was grilled in Parliament, in a hearing which resembled in style the grilling handed out to Godwin Grech last week in Canberra.

The substance of the David Kelly matter was much more serious:
... "David Christopher Kelly CMG (May 14, 1944 – July 17, 2003) was an employee of the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (MoD), an expert in biological warfare and a former United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq.
... "Kelly's discussion with Today Programme journalist Andrew Gilligan about the British government's dossier on weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq inadvertently caused a major political scandal.
... "He was found dead days after appearing before the Parliamentary committee charged with investigating the scandal."
... Source: Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(weapons_expert)

The matter at hand the other day relates to a supposedly fake email, purporting to have come from the Prime Minister's Office. The subject matter is by all reasonable assessment - trivial - supposed assistance to a car dealer in getting finance.

However, the manner of the Media's treatment of the poor guy at the centre of this "Storm in a Tea Cup" is far from trivial. He was grilled last Friday in a Senate Estimates Committee hearing, for about two hours. His immediate supervisor and the Minister presiding over the hearing both sought to prevent him from answering questions. By all accounts they "monstered him".

There is a possible alternative interpretation that they were trying to protect him from himself. Why?
Perhaps they already knew - what I believe - that this guy is too honest for his own good. He cannot bring himself to lie. If so, then I fear for him.

This morning's media reports that Godwin Grech's house was "egged" last night. That is hardly life threatening - unless one is already of a fragile psychological disposition.
By all accounts this guy is very quiet, very private.
Thanks to the Media exposure, any hooligan with a political motive knows where he lives and can go and harrass the poor guy.

Let us not forget the tragic outcome of the David Kelly case.

Before it is too late, the Media ought back off Godwin Grech's case.

I have deliberately not linked to any Media stories. If you have not heard of this story, I would be amazed. But I do not wish to add to the feeding frenzy, by posting any links.

If it transpires that someone with a political motive deliberately set up Godwin Grech, by sending the fake email to him - because they know he is so "straight" that he would not imagine it to be a hoax - then I hope that the full power of the law descends upon that person (and his or her fellow conspirators).

Well, I am glad that I gave Godwin the benefit of the doubt. But it now appears he might not have deserved it.
Today's papers say he has been a "Liberal Party Mole" for years - providing leaked information from Treasury to them.
If that is true, then the bureaucracy will deal with him.
And so they should.

As an old Public Servant I have known such people, and I despise them. Standards of service need to be upheld.
Traitors deserve to be punished - and the bureaucracy has a million ways of doing that.

Or else, he could do the decent thing, and resign. But then he would probably end up a Liberal Party hero.
Better that the Bureaucracy bury him in a room with no window, no in-tray, no out-tray, and especially no telephone or computer.
They can do that, you know!


Thursday, 18 June 2009

Arms sales "build relationships"

This came from crikey.com.au today

Meanwhile in the real world ...  number 452 in an occasional series.

U.S. government-to-government arms sales are growing fast and will likely exceed the bullish estimate of $40 billion for 2009, the Pentagon's top arms sales official said on Wednesday at the Paris Air Show.

Vice Admiral Jeffrey Wieringa, head of the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency, told Reuters it was unclear if arms sales would keep rising, but noted that was possible since several large weapons competitions were underway, and many countries had aging equipment to replace.

Arms sales were at a "pretty unprecedented level" after averaging $8 billion to $13 billion per year in the early 2000s, Wieringa said in an interview.

Sales in the first half reached $27 billion, some 60 percent of the year's expected total, making it likely the actual 2009 total would top $40 billion, he said.

Wieringa said the Obama administration was committed to building international partnerships, and arms sales were an important instrument of that policy.

"We sell stuff to build relationships," he said.

Boom times for irony too.

Indeed - it is almost as good as that old "Hippy" era Anti-War slogan:

"Fighting for Peace is like Fu*cking for Virginity".

Who thought that the Obama Presidency would make a difference?

With people like Admiral Wieringa in charge, think again.


Monday, 15 June 2009

Peter Costello - the Man who never was.

This man's dream is over.Peter Costello, young student activist as a student at Monash; pushy Lawyer who won the Dollar Sweets case and the Mudginberri abbatoir case against the meat Workers Union; young Parliamentarian; Treasurer of this country for an interminable period; "Leader in waiting" for most of that time - has finally realised he never was as good as he liked to think he was.

That is something which many of us have known for a very long time.

Go away, Peter.

I ought thank Bernard Keane for plagiarising my title.
Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. I published at 9:15 pm last night. This item came out in Crikey at 1:49 pm today.
1 . The man who never was: Peter Costello closes the door

Canberra correspondent Bernard Keane writes:

Oh well, at least the rest of his article is his own work.


Sunday, 14 June 2009

Submission to the Human Rights Consultation Panel

Today I have forwarded to the Human Rights Consultation panel the following submission.
Just a reminder that your one and only chance to make your own submission closes at 5:00pm tomorrow.
Denis Wilson
Human Rights Consultation
My proposals are submitted for your consideration - as below.
They are also attached in Word Document format.
Kindly acknowledge receipt of my submission, and that its contents will be considered.
I would be prepared to make a personal presentation of my views in support of this Submission.
I agree to have my submission published - with name and suburb - but not my personal contact details.
Denis Wilson
Citizen of Australia
Robertson NSW 2577
14 June 2009

Contact details: (NOT for publication on HR Consultation website).
PO Box 3158
Robertson, NSW 2577

Body of my Submission

I wish to make a submission in support of a Bill of Rights being introduced in Australia.
My concern is prompted especially by the rapid erosion of human rights seen during the period of the Howard Government, especially in the abominable treatment of Ms Cornelia Rau and Vivian Solon, and of Dr Haneef. These cases demonstrated the way in which a Government can operate without concern for the most basic of human rights of the individual.
I also believe that we need to assert our basic Human Rights against the intrusive powers the Government has granted to itself under the "Australian Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 (Revised)".
In particular:
  • "Preventive detention": potential for detention for named individuals: without evidence; and without criminal involvement; the detainee may be interrogated by Australian Security Intelligence Organisation; disclosing that an individual has been so detained or interrogated is, in almost all circumstances, a crime.
  • "Control orders": Potential for almost unlimited restrictions on named individuals: freedom of movement; freedom of association (including one's lawyer); banning the performing of named actions and owning named items, including actions and things necessary to earn a living; unlimited requirements to be, or not to be, at specified places at any or all times of the day and week; wear a tracking device; and including encouragement to submit to re-education. These restrictions are referred to as "control orders", and may be granted for a period of one year before review.
Although these events took place under the Howard Government, the Rudd Government has not acted in a way to give me any confidence that it believes or understands the need for basic Human Rights in Australia.
Therefore, I believe we need a Bill of Rights to be introduced into Australia.

Australia was responsible for introducing economic and social rights into the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But unlike all other progressive Nations, it has taken no national measures to ensure the effective recognition of these universal rights by passing them into law – in other words, by legislating a bill of rights. After sixty years of delay, the time has come to make amends.

The bill of rights should therefore accurately reflect the spirit and substance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which reads :

Article 1.

  • All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

  • Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

  • Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

  • No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

  • No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

  • Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

  • All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

  • Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

  • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

  • Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

  • (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
  • (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

  • No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
  • (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
  • (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
  • (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

  • (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
  • (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
  • (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
  • (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

  • Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
  • (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
  • (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
  • (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

  • Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
  • (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
  • (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
  • (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

  • Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
  • (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

  • (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
  • (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
  • (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

  • (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
  • (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

  • Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

  • (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
  • (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
  • (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

  • Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
There is another specific "right" which I would like to see introduced as well - the "Right to Water as a basic human right". As the "Right to Water" is perhaps regarded as a "novel idea" (to the Panel) I wish to explain something of the background to this part of my submission.
This is based upon a draft of Article 31 which has already been scheduled for deliberation by the UN General Assembly.
  • "Everyone has the right to clean and accessible water, adequate for the health and well-being of the individual and family, and no one shall be deprived of such access or quality of water due to individual economic circumstance."

The United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in its 22 May, 2009 report expressed concern about the negative impact of climate change on the right to an adequate standard of living, including on the right to water, affecting in particular indigenous peoples, in spite of the State Party's recognition of the challenges imposed by climate change. "It needs to the recognised that sooner or later the Federal government will need to (or be forced to) take on the role of conservator and distributor of water without fear of favour. Corrupt and parochial state and local governments can have no part in such undertakings and neither can cash up private companies who have shown an inclination to feed corruption for their own ends". (Bruce Haig and Kellie Tranter. Courtesy ABC Online, May 27, 2009)

"National Water Plans and Senate Inquiries offer little hope of prescribing the empirical rethink that is manifestly required. The implications of "getting it wrong" are quite simply too momentous to leave the task in the hands of those who happen to be charged with governmental responsibility at this time" (Ian Douglas, Fair Water Use (Australia):
courtesy ABC Online, Sept 16, 2008) In his concluding notes on the Right to a Pristine
Environment, (Statute of Liberty pp 205/6, Geoffrey Robertson says,' there are repeated references in international treaties and resolutions to the human right to a healthy environment. It has been recognised in the South African Constitution and by the Supreme Court of Canada. Australians proudly sing "our land abounds in nature's gifts in beauty rich and rare", so why not provide nature's gifts with a measure of legal protection against being given away.' This must include the essential right to water as a global
commons. (Article 31, United Nations, Maude Barlow Blue Gold /Blue Covenant)


  • The Right to Water and a Healthy Environment.
    The Federal Government of Australia will use its vested powers to ensure that its citizens are vouchsafed the fundamental human right to water for sustenance and all reasonable use. The governance of the nation's water, including determination of "reasonable use", will fall under the sole jurisdiction of a fully independent body accountable, via federal parliament, to the Australian people. The structure and independence of this water authority will be analogous to that of the Reserve Bank of Australia. The right to water will be declared an essential human right as a global commons. Under this definition, the right to water will be given precedence and advantage, in international and local law, over any other interests. Access to water will not be subject to market forces or to
    private or corporate interests. The precautionary principle of ecosystem protection must take precedence over commercial demands on water.

    The carriage of this right will always be within the public domain. Any dilution of this right or interference in its carriage will be declared an offence under Australian Federal law. These fundamental rights are contained within, and hold self-evident, provisions pertaining to the right to a pristine and healthy environment, namely:
    • The right:
      (i) to an environment that is not harmful to their health or wellbeing of citizens;
      (ii) to have the environment protected, for the benefit of present and future generations, through reasonable legislative and other measures that:
      (a) prevent pollution and ecological degradation;
      (b) promote conservation; and protect native flora and fauna, and areas necessary to maintain biological diversity and ecosystems;
      (c) secure ecologically sustainable development and use of natural resources while promoting justifiable economic and social development;
      (d) to establish a planning system that ensures encroachments upon areas of natural beauty or heritage value and species and ecological communities of National Environmental Significance are not approved unless by fair, transparent and non-corrupt process, which takes that value into account.
      (iii) to timely and adequate assistance in the event of fire, flood, cyclone or other natural disaster or catastrophe.

Furthermore, I would like to see several guiding principles introduced into the proposed Bill of Rights as well. Although expressed here as "rights" I see them as being "guiding principles" relating to the implementation of the other more basic Human Rights outlined above.


  • Citizens and residents have the right to hold corporations, private actors, agencies, agents and instrumentalities and similar persons and entities accountable for ecological (inclusive of human social) degradation and despoliation impacting on the rights described here.
  • Citizens and residents have the right to hold corporations, private actors, agencies, agents and instrumentalities and similar persons and entities accountable for cruel animal welfare practices and unsustainable environmental practices in the supply of food.


  • Citizens and residents have the right to interactive consultation and dialogue – as individuals, groups or organisations - with governments, their agencies, agents and instrumentalities and corporations, whether public or private, which affect their interests.
  • A code of conduct will be drawn up by governments and corporations with widespread and representative community input to ensure a high standard of interactive consultation and dialogue. Such interactive consultation and dialogue will be based upon freedom of information with the same rights of discovery as exist judicially. This will be known as the Consultation and Dialogue (CaD) process.
  • All major environmental applications will be subject to the Consultation and Dialogue (CaD) process.

Denis Wilson
14 June 2009

Tuesday, 9 June 2009

Re: Its Now or Never - for water as a human right.

The opportunity to comment on water as part of a Bill of Rights in Australia will CLOSE NEXT WEEK. (15 June).
The "World Water Forum" sounds wonderful, but it is of course, the collective of all the leading multinational food groups and water pumpers (water thieves). They advocate "Full Cost Recovery". It is a mantra which they repeat at every opportunity, and conservative, neo-liberal Governments (including the Rudd Government) love to talk in those terms.
By contrast, the Global Water Justice Movement has a very different view. One which is closer to my heart:
"The global water justice movement advocates for community-led solutions to the water crisis. We uphold water as the basic element of all life on the planet and as a fundamental and inalienable human right."
To find out what Australians can do to rectify the situation see Brigid's post on the Human Rights Consultation.
It may be the only opportunity we have in our lifetimes to make the case for water as a Human Right. The Government may well ignore our views, but I for one, could not live with myself if I did not try.
Individuals are able to make even very simple submissions - it need not be a very long, submission in "legalese".
Just the words: "I want to have my right to water recognised in a Bill of Rights" would qualify as a legitimate submission.
Go to this site to find out more:
You can make an on-line submission (limit 20,000 characters) or attach a more detailed submission. There is a phone line for inquiries listed on that site.
In the on-line form there is a list of suggested topics to click about what your submission is about.
You need to click the bottom one "Other" and insert the words "Right to Water".
Denis Wilson